| | |  | SYRIA | Home » » Charlie Rose with Bashar al-Assad (March 27, 2006) | | | | | | | Product Details: | | | Format:
| NTSC | | Studio:
| "Charlie Rose, Inc." | | DVD Release Date:
| August 10, 2006 | | Average Customer Rating:
|  based on 1 reviews |
| | | | Customer Reviews: | |
Average Customer Review:
 ( 1 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
0 of 1 found the following review helpful:
Is it correct to interview an enemy ?Dec 18, 2007
By Shalom Freedman
"Shalom Freedman"
I am not sure that Charlie Rose did the right think by interviewing Bashar Assad. On the one hand he does the journalist's job of searching out the subject, exploring the reality presenting this to his viewers. On the other hand he provides a platform for an enemy of his own country, a mendacious dictator who lies to him in his face, repeatedly. Rose does not ask one question which had to be asked. The Syrians are allegedly supplying a large number of infiltrators into Iraq, who are attacking and killing Americans. This should have been Rose's first question.
Rose does ask other tough questions, on first instance the Harari assassination. Everybody in the world believes Syria did this. Harari was Assad's opponent, and Rose does point out that it is Harari's son who says Assad threatened Harari immediately before the assassination. Assad smiles and lies, and says he knows Syria had nothing to do with it. Rose also asks Assad about Holocaust- denial of Ahmadinejad. Here the body- language, the evasion, the attempt to get out of it by Assad are blatant. He says something like 'Some Jews were killed'. Rose is to be credited for correcting him and pointing to it being a matter of 'extermination' and not of killing here and there.
Assad tells Rose he wants 'peace' but feels misunderstood. Rose does not point out the dictatorial character of Assad's regime, or mention minority Alawite rule over the majority Sunnis. Assad clearly wants a lifting of American sanctions and economic benefits. Rose does not go into the character of the Syrian regime.
Again I am sure that Charlie Rose should have done this interview. But then perhaps his view is that the viewer has to be the one who judges the 'truth' of what he is presented with.
| | |
|
